MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401432374 · doi:10.17116/jnevro2024124071119

Integrative assessment of the effectiveness and safety of outpatient use of Picamilon

2024· article· en· W4401432374 on OpenAlexaffabout
Danilov Ab, Natalya N. Shindryaeva, Irina V. Borodulina, T.D. Lunegov

Bibliographic record

VenueS S Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. To study the efficacy and safety of the use of the drug Picamilon with various therapy regimens in patients with stage I of chronic cerebral ischemia (CCI). Material and methods. Material and methods. An open randomized comparative clinical trial included 44 patients with stage CCI aged 46 to 67 years (average age 55.6±6.76 years). Patients were randomized into two groups, patients of group 1 (n=23) received Picamilon orally in tablets of 50 mg 3 times/day for 60 days; group 2 (n=21) received Picamilon first parenterally at 100 mg i/m for 10 days, then in tablets of 50 mg 3 times/day for 50 days. The total duration of therapy was 60 days. The study included 4 visits (before treatment, 10 days later, 60 days later, 1.5 months after completion of treatment). The dynamics of cognitive status were assessed according to the Montreal Cognitive Function Assessment Scale (MoCA), vegetative disorders on the A.M. Wayne scale, neurological disorders on the A.I. Fedin scale, and sleep quality on the Ya.I. Levin scale. The study of the state of cerebral blood flow (dopplerography of intracranial vessels) and endothelial function (assessment of the level of methylation. Results. During treatment, in the total sample of patients, there was a positive trend in the results of the MoCA scale, increasing in the delayed period (24.9/26.5/28.3 points, p=0.022 and p<0.001); improvement in sleep quality in 50% of patients by visit 3 and in 84% by visit 4, in the 2nd group the effect occurred in 28% of patients, in the 1st — in 11%, by the end of the study the effect was comparable (p=0.508). Improvement according to Fedin A.I. scale noted in 77% of patients, values decreased from 11.9±8.3 to 6±6.1 points (p<0.0001) and to 2.77±4.43 points by visit 4 (p<0.0001). Normalization of autonomic functions was observed in 29% of patients (p=0.024) without intergroup differences. Picamilon therapy showed high efficacy in terms of clinical outcomes (up to 89%), good tolerability (98% of patients) and a favorable safety profile (less than 8.6% of AEs). The use of Picamilon was accompanied by an increase in the linear velocity of blood flow, a decrease in the thickness of the intima-media complex and the resistance index; a decrease in elevated ADMA concentrations and ADMA/MMA and (ADMA+SDMA)/MMA ratios. Conclusion. The use of Picamilon is effective in patients with stage I CCI, contributes to a significant regression of neurological deficits, cognitive impairment, improved sleep quality and autonomic function; improves vascular endothelial function, reduces the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular complications in patients. The optimal duration of therapy with Picamilon in stage I of chronic cerebral ischemia is 2 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueS S Korsakov Journal of Neurology and PsychiatrySame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207