MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401435722 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.07.606967

Transposable elements impact the human regulatory landscape through cell type specific epigenomic associations

2024· preprint· en· W4401435722 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Hyacinthe, Guillaume Bourque

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigenomeEpigenomicsHistoneBiologyChromatinGenomeTransposable elementGeneticsDNA methylationEpigeneticsHuman genomeComputational biologyGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Transposable elements (TEs) are DNA sequences able to create copies of themselves within the genome. Despite their limited expression due to silencing, TEs still manage to impact the host genome. For instance, some TEs have been shown to act as cis-regulatory elements and be co-opted in the human genome. This highlights that the contributions of TEs to the host might come from their relationship with the epigenome rather than their expression. However, a systematic analysis that relates TEs in the human genome directly with chromatin histone marks across distinct cell types remains lacking. Here we leverage a new dataset from the International Human Epigenome Consortium with 4867 uniformly processed ChIP-seq experiments for 6 histone marks across 175 annotated cell labels and show that TEs have drastically different enrichments levels across marks. Overall, we find that TEs are generally depleted in H3K9me3 histone modification, except for L1s, while MIRs were highly enriched in H3K4me1, H3K27ac and H3K27me3 and Alus were enriched in H3K36me3. Furthermore, we present a generalised profile of the relationship between TEs enrichment and TE age which reveals a few TE families (Alu, MIR, L2) as diverging from expected dynamics. We also find significant differences in TE enrichment between cell types and that in 20% of the cases, these enrichments were cell-type specific. Moreover, we report that at least 4% of cell types-histone-TE combinations featured significant differences in enrichment between healthy and cancer samples. Notably, we identify 456 cell type-histone-TE triplets with strong cell-type specific enrichments. We show that many of these triplets are associated with relevant biological processes and genes expressed in the relevant cell type. These results further support a role for TE in genome regulation and highlight novel associations between TEs and histone marks across cell types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207