MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401435885 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljae266.036

657 - Impact of pruritus on patient fatigue: a case-control study

2024· article· en· W4401435885 on OpenAlexaff
Luis F. Andrade, Zaim Haq, Parsa Abdi, Michael J. Diaz, Gil Yosipovitch

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtopic dermatitisDermatology Life Quality IndexQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineOdds ratioDepression (economics)CohortItchingDiseaseDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pruritus, either as a chronic standalone disease or secondary to inflammatory skin disease, can have a very detrimental effect on the overall quality of life for patients suffering from intense itch, particularly on patients suffering from atopic dermatitis. Symptoms of itching have a reported association with worsened quality of life across various psychological and social domains, including fewer periods of rest and reduced sleep quality. While prior studies have been made to determine the relationship between both fatigue and pruritus combined on systematic disease severity, there is limited data on how the prevalence of pruritus directly correlates with the prevalence of fatigue. Objective We utilized the AoU database to perform a nested case-control study to determine the impact of pruritus on patient-reported fatigue. Methods Within this database, patients experiencing pruritus (chronic pruritus, chronic pruritus of unknown origin (CPUO), prurigo nodularis, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis) were identified and matched to four controls using nearest neighbor propensity-score matching, with sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Comparative analyses between pruritus cases and controls were performed utilizing the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the unpaired t-test for continuous variables. Logistic regression models were developed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of having pruritus (SNOMED: 279333002, ICD10CM-L29), and developing fatigue (SNOMED: 84229001, ICD10CM-R53.83), with covariates including age, race/ethnicity, sex, income, education, anxiety, and depression. A significance level was set at P<0.05, and 95% confidence intervals were developed using the Wald method. Results From the cohort with accessible electronic health records (EHR) in 91,212 controls and 22,803 cases of pruritus were identified (mean age 59.91 [standard deviation: 15.95], 63.57% female). Patients afflicted with pruritus demonstrated a noticeably elevated prevalence of fatigue (40.81%) compared to the control group (22.06%). After adjusting for demographics and other covariates in multivariable analysis, chronic pruritus remained significantly associated with fatigue, with a multivariable adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.56 (95% CI 1.16-2.07. In-depth analysis revealed that specific pruritic conditions exhibited strong associations with fatigue, namely, CPOU (aOR 2.27, 95% CI 1.35-3.82), prurigo nodularis (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.87-2.61), and atopic dermatitis (Aor 2.05, 95% CI 1.97-2.13). Conclusion Our study provides a quantitative measure of pruritus’ impact on the prevalence of patient-reported fatigue across many pruritic conditions, including atopic dermatitis. This two-fold increase in fatigue in patients with itch further emphasizes the clinical importance of understanding the impact of pruritus on patient quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207