MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401436405 · doi:10.5539/jas.v16n9p59

What Are University Incubated Agribusinesses: A Sustainability Description of University Incubated Agribusinesses in Kenya

2024· article· en· W4401436405 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Racheal Gladys Nakiganda, Dickson Okello, Hillary K. Bett, Patience M. Mshega

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEgerton University
KeywordsAgribusinessEntrepreneurshipMindsetSustainabilityUnemploymentBusinessMarketingEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconomicsAgricultureGeographyBiologyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Universities are promoting entrepreneurship incubation as a means of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset and creation of business ventures among university students. This is necessitated by the bulging youth unemployment among university graduates in the world and most sub-Saharan African countries. This initiative aims at creating graduates who are job creators and not job seekers. Despite these efforts, youth unemployment rates continue to rise among most graduates. Moreover, most university-incubated youth-led businesses have a high failure rate with a majority of them not seeing a second birthday. To address this issue, the study sought to examine the nature of incubated agribusinesses and their sustainability performance in seven selected universities in Kenya. A multistage sampling procedure technique along with Cochran’s (1963) formula for determining populations that are large and unknown were used to select 272 respondents whose businesses were incubated at their universities. Using an index and descriptive statistics, University Incubated agribusinesses in Kenya on average exist for only one year and five months. Results also revealed that the university-incubated agribusinesses under study were 68.2% sustainable indicating a fair performance. They revealed a higher performance in social sustainability (72.8% of its dimensional scores) as compared to economic and environmental sustainability (65.2% and 70% respectively of their dimensional scores). To ensure the long-term success of university-incubated youth agribusinesses, the study recommends that university business incubators should assess the expectations of their participants before they enroll them. The study also suggests that universities should create standardized policies, and procedures governing all stages of incubation. Moreover, youths with university-incubated agribusinesses need to intensify their economic, social, and environmental practices and strategies to ensure the holistic sustainability of their agribusinesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural Science→Same topicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences→French-language works237,207→