MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401453989 · doi:10.1080/14772019.2024.2373116

<i>Cornualbus primus</i> gen. et sp. nov.: a new procolophonid (Reptilia: Parareptilia) from Upper Triassic of South America, first tetrapod from the Passo das Tropas Member of the Santa Maria Supersequence

2024· article· en· W4401453989 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Silva‐Neves, Átila Augusto Stock Da‐Rosa, Sean P. Modesto, Sérgio Dias‐da‐Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systematic Palaeontology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetrapod (structure)PaleontologyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Procolophonidae is the most successful Parareptilia group throughout Pangaea. For almost two decades, the study of the most derived South American procolophonids only included the description of new specimens belonging to well-known species, mostly Procolophon trigoniceps. On the basis of a recently collected skull and associated postcranial elements from the early Carnian (Upper Triassic) of Brazil, we describe a new procolophonid, Cornualbus primus gen. et sp. nov. A phylogenetic analysis recovers this new procolophonid within the subfamily Leptopleuroninae, forming a clade with the leptopleuronines Hypsognathus fenneri, Leptopleuron lacertinum, Mandaphon nadra, Hwiccewyrm trispiculum, and Soturnia caliodon. Cornualbus primus bridges a temporal gap in South American procolophonids, which extended from the Induan to the Norian, in addition to being the oldest Leptopleuroninae described for South America. Furthermore, the description of this taxon enriches our knowledge of procolophonid diversity for the South American Triassic period. https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C95A0DCF-CD53-48DF-B323-490E0569286B

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systematic PalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207