MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401456918 · doi:10.1115/omae2024-122691

Understanding the Role of Buoyancy on Jet Flows Within Viscoplastic Medium: Insights for Plug and Abandonment of Wells

2024· article· en· W4401456918 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hafezi, Hossein Hassanzadeh, Soheil Akbari, Mohsen Faramarzi, Seyed Mohammad Taghavi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbandonment (legal)ViscoplasticityBuoyancyJet (fluid)MechanicsGeologyMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringThermodynamicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plug and abandonment (P&A) operation refers to the final stage of the oil and gas well’s operational life-cycle. The successful implementation of a P&A operation ensures the secure sealing of the well to prevent fluid movement and eliminate leakage between different layers. The key steps of a P&A operation entail three processes: (1) accessing the annulus section, (2) cleaning the target area (i.e., inside and outside the casing), and (3) installing cement plug barriers. The proper cleaning helps to enhance the cement-casing bonding while mitigating the risk of cement contamination. Jet cleaning, known as an efficient technique in the second step of P&A operations, displaces undesirable fluids and materials by injecting a cleaning fluid into the target area. Fluid properties, including density difference between injected and ambient fluids and the fluids’ rheological parameters, stand as key variables that directly influence the cleaning efficiency. Hence, a comprehensive understanding of how these parameters affect the jet flow is crucial for optimizing efficiency in well-cleaning procedures. In this study, we experimentally examine the miscible jet flow dynamics for two distinct scenarios: positively buoyant jets, where momentum and buoyancy act in the same direction, and negatively buoyant jets, where they act in opposite directions. The jet flow is formed by introducing a Newtonian fluid vertically downward, through a circular nozzle, into a transparent tank containing a viscoplastic fluid. We assume a “free jet” condition in our experiments, as the large tank dimensions render the wall effect negligible on the jet behavior. We use high-speed imaging to study the effects of the injection velocity, the density difference, and the rheological parameters (in particular, the yield stress) on the jet flow dynamics. The penetration length (indicating the evolution of the jet length over time) is the primary jet feature addressed in this study, which is investigated in both positively and negatively buoyant jets. Our findings show that the yield stress of the ambient fluid resists the jet evolution, leading to a decrease in the jet penetration length.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→