MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401461908 · doi:10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-9658

The Anisotropy of Rock Drilling in Marble Quarry Mining Based on the Relationship between Vertical and Horizontal Drilling Rates

2024· article· en· W4401461908 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Rezaei, Kamran Esmaeili

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geomechanics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingGeologyMining engineeringDirectional drillingGeotechnical engineeringAnisotropyPetroleum engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a high correlation between rock engineering behavior and the anisotropy index, which is crucial for the safety assessment of rock properties. In rock drilling, rock anisotropy significantly affects the cost and efficiency of the drilling project. Therefore, the anisotropy during the rock drilling process is investigated in this study. First, measurements of horizontal and vertical drilling rates were conducted at a marble quarry. Then, experimental tests were conducted to measure the physical and mechanical properties of collected minor rock blocks corresponding to the major under-drilling marble blocks. Through this process, a total of 40 data sets comprising vertical and horizontal drilling rates and 12 different rock properties were provided. The results showed that the vertical drilling rate correlates more with rock mechanical properties, while the horizontal drilling rate is associated more with physical characteristics. Also, sensitivity analysis confirmed that porosity and dry density are the most and least effective variables on both vertical and horizontal drilling rates, respectively. Based on the analysis of variance, the polynomial equation was found to be the optimum relationship between vertical and horizontal drilling rates. Based on the comparative analysis and using actual data sets, the accuracy of the proposed equation was proved. Finally, a drilling anisotropy index was proposed based on the ratio of vertical to horizontal drilling rates. The results showed that the drilling anisotropy index is more prominent in rock blocks with high-strength properties. Also, it was proved that the drilling anisotropy index has an inverse relation with vertical and horizontal drilling rates. As the vertical and horizontal drilling rates are inherently affected by different rock properties, it can be concluded that the suggested relationship between vertical and horizontal drilling rates and the proposed drilling anisotropy index could be effectively applied to assessing the interaction of drilling rates with rock properties in anisotropic rocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of GeomechanicsSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207