Natural Variation in Sexual Traits and Gene Expression between Selfing and Outcrossing <i>Arabidopsis lyrata</i> Suggests Sexual Selection at Work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flowering plants show significant diversity in sexual strategies, profoundly impacting the evolution of sexual traits and associated genes. Sexual selection is one of the primary evolutionary forces driving sexual trait variation, particularly evident during pollen-pistil interactions, where pollen grains compete for fertilization and females select mating partners. Multiple mating may intensify competition among pollen donors for siring, while in contrast, self-fertilization reduces sire-sire competition, relaxing the sexual selection pressure. Traits involved in male-male competition and female choice are well described, and molecular mechanisms underlying pollen development and pollen-pistil interactions have been extensively studied in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana. However, whether these molecular mechanisms are involved in sexual selection in nature remains unclear. To address this gap, we measured intrinsic pollen performance and its interaction with female choice and investigated the associated gene expression patterns in a selfing and an outcrossing population of Arabidopsis lyrata. We found that pollen germination and pollen tube growth were significantly higher in outcrossers than selfers, and this difference was accompanied by changes in the expression of genes involved in vesicle transport and cytoskeleton. Outcrosser mother plants showed a negative impact on pollen tube growth compared to selfer mother plants, together with a difference of expression for genes involved in auxin and stress response, suggesting a potential mechanism for female choice through molecular cross talk at the post-pollination stage. Our study provides insight into the impact of sexual selection on the evolution of sexual gene expression in plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".