Thembelani and Khuseleka Mines in the Bushveld Igneous Complex's Western Limb in South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The Merensky (MER) orebody in the Bushveld Complex in South Africa has been mined extensively. Regional and local pillars, zones of unmined ground, potholes, and remnants were left in-situ. 15 to 400 m beneath the MER orebody, the UG2 chromitite orebody is currently being exploited. Due to the location of these two orebodies, it is postulated that the unmined ground in the MER above may have an influence on the current UG2 ground conditions. Although many mining variables could have impacted the successful exploitation of the UG2, the in-situ blocks of ground on the MER reef horizon seemed to present an additional risk, which had not been extensively researched before. Of concern is that, this phenomenon is occurring at different depths and different middling between the two orebody packages. In some cases, it was found that relatively shallow UG2 reef mining could encounter conditions like those experienced in deep mining environments (e.g., spalling, scaling pillars, and rockburst hazard). Source mechanisms of significant mining-related seismic events (ML≥1.0) were analyzed and facilitated the comprehension of the dominant modes of failure. Much of the work focused on seismic events triggered by movement along planes of weakness and the closure rate experienced by the stopes in both the MER and UG2. 1. BACKGROUND The Merensky Reef is a regular, persistent tabular orebody with various layers: pegmatoid, chromitite, and pyroxenite (Lougher and Mellowship, 1991). It is generally composed of an upper feldspathic pyroxenite assemblage near the top of the Upper Group of the Upper Critical Zone of the Bushveld Complex. It is overlying a thin basal chromitite stringer, followed by an anorthosite to norite footwall and a thin anorthosite layer (0.1 – 0.2 m thick), which is underlain by norite (Fig. 1). Locally, this is termed a "pyroxenite reef". The UG2 chromitite layer comprises chromitite and pegmatoid units. It is well renowned for its short-distance undulation due to its conformable interaction with the footwall. The UG2 Reef is made up of a coarse plagioclase-orthopyroxene pegmatoid layer that can grade into coarse pyroxenite (Leeb-Du Toit, 1986). The reef's thickness ranges from 0.2 to 2 m, with an average of about 0.7 m. The absence of coarse pyroxenite beneath the UG2 chromitite layer suggests that the stratum is potholed (Lougher and Mellowship, 1991). The UG2 Reef consists of a primary chromitite layer, which contains the majority of the PGM and base metal mineralization, followed by a poorly mineralized pegmatoidal pyroxenite footwall (Fig. 1). The hanging wall to the main chromitite layer is feldspathic pyroxenite with up to four thin, weakly mineralized chromitite layers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".