MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401481617 · doi:10.56952/arma-2024-0043

A Numerical Solution to the Flow-Induced Vibration of a Hanging String in a Storage Cavern

2024· article· en· W4401481617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. D. Chieslar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsString (physics)VibrationFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceMechanicsGeologyPhysicsAcousticsTheoretical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: A hanging string is the center pipe or tube in a storage cavern. It is situated inside of a cemented casing and, in conjunction with the cemented casing, is used to move product (crude oil, propane, natural gas, etc.) into and out from the storage cavern. When the injected fluid exits the hanging string, it exerts a back-pressure, causing the string to vibrate. Above a certain injection flow rate, the vibration becomes unstable. Before this condition, however, the string may bend and even break due to fatigue. Recently a field test (Reitze, A. 2019) was conducted at four different injection rates to assess the tendency for the hanging string to vibrate. This provided the opportunity to validate closed form solutions (Ratigan, J. 2004, 2017). The purpose of this communication is to provide a numerical solution to this problem. The numerical model produced results within the minimum and maximum vibration amplitudes recorded in the field test, at all four flow rates. Furthermore the numerical solution affords the opportunity to capture effects not normally addressed in closed form solutions. 1. INTRODUCTION As early as 2004 SMRI (Solution Mining Research Institute) (Ratigan, J. 2004) has taken an interest in the vibrations of hanging strings in storage caverns by virtue of it's funding research into this phenomenon. A cavern operator would naturally prefer to maximize the flow rate while avoiding any possible damage. Consequently there exists a motivation to definitively characterize this phenomenon. While it may be most common that the hanging string is a 10.75 inch (0.273 meter) diameter pipe, the length of the string beyond the cemented casing as well as the fluids involved would certainly impact the flow rate at which instability develops. To this end SMRI recently funded a field test (Reitze, A. 2019) in which a hanging string was instrumented and motions were measured at four different flow rates. Prior to this McGill University undertook research into this phenomenon which involved the development of analytical models as well as bench-scale testing. This work may be summarized in the thesis of S. L. Minas (Minas, S.L. 2017).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207