Total sulfur amino acid requirements are higher during late gestation compared with early gestation in healthy Canadian pregnancies in a repeated-measures trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Recommendations for total sulfur amino acids (TSAAs; methionine + cysteine) during pregnancy are based on factorial calculations using data from adult males. To date, no data exist on TSAA requirements obtained directly during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to examine whether TSAA requirements during early (11–20 wk) and late (31–40 wk) gestation in healthy females with singleton pregnancies are different than current recommendations, and different between early and late gestation using the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique. Twenty-five females 20–40 y with a healthy singleton pregnancy were studied using the IAAO technique in a repeated measures design for a total of 70, 8-h d. On each study day a methionine test intake (range: 0–40 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1) was provided in 8 hourly, isonitrogenous and isocaloric meals with cysteine excluded from the diet. Breath samples were collected at baseline and isotopic steady state of orally provided L-1-13C-Phenylalanine for measurement of phenylalanine oxidation. The requirement was determined using biphasic linear regression crossover analysis to identify a breakpoint in 13CO2 production, representing the estimated average requirement (EAR). The TSAA requirement in healthy pregnant participants in early gestation was 11.1 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1 {R2m = 0.79, R2c = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] (8.9, 13.3 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1)} and 15.0 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1 (R2m = 0.72, R2c = 0.79; 95% CI [13.0, 17.0 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1]) in late gestation. The difference between confidence intervals of the 2 breakpoints was = −3.9 ± 3.0, and statistically different. We directly measured TSAA requirements in healthy pregnant mothers, and our findings suggest that requirements are lower than current DRI recommendations of 20 and 25 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1, as the EAR, and Recommended Dietary Allowance, respectively. Late gestation TSAA needs are significantly different and increased 35% compared with early gestation. Recommendations for TSAA intake need to be tailored for gestational stage. This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04326322.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".