MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401487185 · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.07.034

Total sulfur amino acid requirements are higher during late gestation compared with early gestation in healthy Canadian pregnancies in a repeated-measures trial

2024· article· en· W4401487185 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kerri Scherbinsky, Betina Rasmussen, Bingqing Li, Dehan Kong, Ronald O. Ball, Paul B. Pencharz, Glenda Courtney‐Martin, Rajavel Elango

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsGestationObstetricsMedicinePregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Recommendations for total sulfur amino acids (TSAAs; methionine + cysteine) during pregnancy are based on factorial calculations using data from adult males. To date, no data exist on TSAA requirements obtained directly during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to examine whether TSAA requirements during early (11–20 wk) and late (31–40 wk) gestation in healthy females with singleton pregnancies are different than current recommendations, and different between early and late gestation using the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique. Twenty-five females 20–40 y with a healthy singleton pregnancy were studied using the IAAO technique in a repeated measures design for a total of 70, 8-h d. On each study day a methionine test intake (range: 0–40 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1) was provided in 8 hourly, isonitrogenous and isocaloric meals with cysteine excluded from the diet. Breath samples were collected at baseline and isotopic steady state of orally provided L-1-13C-Phenylalanine for measurement of phenylalanine oxidation. The requirement was determined using biphasic linear regression crossover analysis to identify a breakpoint in 13CO2 production, representing the estimated average requirement (EAR). The TSAA requirement in healthy pregnant participants in early gestation was 11.1 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1 {R2m = 0.79, R2c = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] (8.9, 13.3 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1)} and 15.0 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1 (R2m = 0.72, R2c = 0.79; 95% CI [13.0, 17.0 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1]) in late gestation. The difference between confidence intervals of the 2 breakpoints was = −3.9 ± 3.0, and statistically different. We directly measured TSAA requirements in healthy pregnant mothers, and our findings suggest that requirements are lower than current DRI recommendations of 20 and 25 mg⋅kg−1⋅d−1, as the EAR, and Recommended Dietary Allowance, respectively. Late gestation TSAA needs are significantly different and increased 35% compared with early gestation. Recommendations for TSAA intake need to be tailored for gestational stage. This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04326322.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207