MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401494035 · doi:10.12680/balneo.2024.697

The muscle strength of the hip joint can be used as a criterion of quality rehabilitation patients after total hip arthroplasty

2024· article· en· W4401494035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marjan Mihajlov, Marian Dragomir, Alexandra Irma Gabriela Bauşic, Kristo Xhardo, Ilie Onu, Laurenţiu-Gabriel Talaghir, Daniel Mădălin Coja, Daniel Andrei Iordan, Carmina Liana Mușat, Bogdan Voicu

Bibliographic record

VenueBalneo and PRM Research Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationHip arthroplastyArthroplastyJoint (building)Total hip arthroplastyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMuscle strengthPhysical therapyMedicineQuality (philosophy)SurgeryEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the assessment of hip joint mobility parameters, namely abduction, extension, and flexion, at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-surgery. These evaluations coincide with the implementation of rehabilitation exercises recommended by the physiotherapist. The study intends to analyze the progression of hip mobility during these specific time intervals in conjunction with the prescribed rehabilitation program. By examining the relationship between the performed exercises and the observed improvements in hip mobility, the research aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the rehabilitation protocol in facilitating post-THA rehabilitation. Material and method: The evaluation of hip joint mobility encompassed measurements of abduction, extension, and flexion utilizing a "Active Force 2" digital dynamometer. In tandem, the functional assessment of patients' health status was conducted through the utilization of the WOMAC index (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). Results: The experimental data acquired in the measurement joint mobility during abduction, extension and flexion at 2, 4 and 6 weeks of exercises performed after THA are presented. Pain: mean score decreased from 3.08 to 1.18 (38.31% improvement); physical difficulties: mean score decreased from 3.10 to 1.01 (32.25% improvement) and joint stiffness: mean score decreased from 3.41 to 0.65 (19.06% improvement). These findings highlight the effectiveness of the recovery exercises in reducing pain, improving physical function, and decreasing joint stiffness post-THA. Conclusions: Our research emphasizes the essential contri-bution of physiotherapists to achieving positive outcomes for patients post-THA surgery. Through a personalized physiotherapy regimen administered during follow-up appointments, patients undergoing THA exhibited notable functional improvements. The study's results high-light the efficacy of this approach in alleviating discomfort, expediting recovery, and enhancing patients' overall quality of life, enabling a smoother transition back to normal daily activities. Keywords: total hip arthroplasty, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, hip joint mobility, muscle strenght

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBalneo and PRM Research JournalSame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207