MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401495930 · doi:10.5376/lgg.2024.15.0013

Genomic Insights into <i>Robinia pseudoacacia</i>: Implications for Silviculture and Beyond

2024· article· en· W4401495930 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
X.Y. Wang, Deming Yu, Qishan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueLegume Genomics and Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobiniaSilvicultureBiologyBotanyAgroforestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robinia pseudoacacia , commonly known as black locust, is a versatile tree species valued for its rapid growth, nitrogen-fixing ability, and high-quality timber. This study explores the genomic insights uncovered in recent years, providing a comprehensive understanding of the genetic composition and functional genomics of this species. Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have facilitated the assembly of the black locust genome, revealing key genes and pathways involved in its growth, development, and stress responses. These insights are crucial for improving silvicultural practices, enabling the development of improved varieties with higher growth rates, better wood quality, and increased resistance to pests and diseases. Understanding the genomic basis of nitrogen fixation in R. pseudoacacia  can lead to the development of more efficient agroforestry systems, contributing to sustainable agriculture and soil improvement. This study also explores the potential of genetic modification and biotechnological approaches to further enhance the desirable traits of black locust, paving the way for its expanded use in various applications, including bioenergy production and ecological restoration. Overall, integrating genomic data with traditional breeding and silvicultural techniques holds great promise for optimizing the utilization of R. pseudoacacia , addressing both economic and environmental challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegume Genomics and GeneticsSame topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207