A canonical polyadic tensor basis for fast Bayesian estimation of multi-subject brain activation patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Task-evoked functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, such as the Human Connectome Project (HCP), are a powerful tool for exploring how brain activity is influenced by cognitive tasks like memory retention, decision-making, and language processing. A fast Bayesian function-on-scalar model is proposed for estimating population-level activation maps linked to the working memory task. The model is based on the canonical polyadic (CP) tensor decomposition of coefficient maps obtained for each subject. This decomposition effectively yields a tensor basis capable of extracting both common features and subject-specific features from the coefficient maps. These subject-specific features, in turn, are modeled as a function of covariates of interest using a Bayesian model that accounts for the correlation of the CP-extracted features. The dimensionality reduction achieved with the tensor basis allows for a fast MCMC estimation of population-level activation maps. This model is applied to one hundred unrelated subjects from the HCP dataset, yielding significant insights into brain signatures associated with working memory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".