Pengaruh Quality of Friendship terhadap Hardiness Siswa Islamic Boarding School di Kota Padang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Islamic Boarding School is a dormitory-based Islamic school that combines a regular curriculum and a religious curriculum. The personality characteristic of hardiness is needed so that students can navigate the systems, regulations and changes that exist in Islamic boarding schools. One of the variables that can influence hardiness is the quality of friendship. The aim of this research is to see the influence of quality of friendship on the hardiness of Islamic boarding school students at junior high level in Padang City. The method used in this research is a quantitative survey with a correlation method. The subjects in this research were junior high school students studying at an Islamic boarding school in Padang City which is under the auspices of the Ministry of Education and Culture with a sample size of 173 students. The technique used in sampling is cluster sampling. Data were collected using the McGill Friendship Questionnaire - Friendship Function scale. The analysis carried out was simple linear regression analysis. The results of the research show that quality of friendship has a positive influence on student hardiness at Islamic boarding schools in Padang City, with an influence contribution of 12.1%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".