MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401502447 · doi:10.1088/1361-6439/ad6dfe

From microchips to microneedles: semiconductor shear testers as a universal solution for transverse load analysis of microneedle mechanical performance

2024· article· en· W4401502447 on OpenAlexafffund
Kazim Haider, Thomas Lijnse, Wenting Shu, Eoin D. O’Cearbhaill, Colin Dalton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMaterials scienceTransverse planeTransverse shearSemiconductorShear (geology)NanotechnologyComposite materialBiomedical engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microneedles are a promising technology for pain-free and efficient pharmaceutical delivery. However, their clinical translation is currently limited by the absence of standardized testing methods for critical quality attributes (CQAs), such as mechanical robustness, which are essential for demonstrating safety and efficacy during regulatory review. A key aspect of mechanical robustness is transverse load capacity, which is currently assessed using diverse, non-standardized methods, which have limited capability to measure transverse failure forces at different heights along a microneedle. This is critical for understanding mechanics of potential failure modes during insertion after skin penetration. In this work we utilize a wire bond shear tester, a piece of test equipment widely used in the semiconductor industry, to measure the transverse load capacities of various microneedle designs. This approach is compatible with diverse microneedle types, geometries, and materials, and offers high-throughput and automated testing capabilities with high precision. We measure transverse failure loads with micron-scale control over the test height and have established comprehensive profiles of mechanical robustness along the length of different microneedle designs, which is a capability not previously demonstrated in literature for polymeric and metal microneedles. Transverse failure forces were 10 ± 0.3 gf–128 ± 12 gf for wire bonded gold and silver microneedles, 11 ± 0.7 gf–480 ± 69 gf for conical and pyramidal polymeric microneedles, and 206 ± 80 gf–381 ± 1 gf for 3D printed conical stainless steel microneedles. Additionally, we present standardized definitions for microneedle structural failure modes resulting from transverse loads, which can facilitate root cause failure analysis and defect detection during design and manufacturing, and aid in risk assessment of microneedle products. This work establishes a standardized approach to evaluating a significant CQA of microneedle products, which is a critical step towards expediting their clinical adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micromechanics and MicroengineeringSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207