MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401510768 · doi:10.1007/s12230-024-09959-1

Primary Non-Inversion Shallow Tillage Versus Moldboard Plowing Prior to Growing Potatoes: Short-Term Impacts on Potato Yield and Soil Properties in Eastern Canada

2024· article· en· W4401510768 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Judith Nyiraneza, Tandra D. Fraser, Danielle Murnaghan, Jessica Matheson, Stephanie Arnold, Kyra Stiles, Dahu Chen, R. D. Peters, Mohammad Khakbazan, Ryan Barrett

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Potato Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsPloughTillageYield (engineering)AgronomyTerm (time)Inversion (geology)MathematicsEnvironmental scienceBiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) production often requires intensive tillage with the moldboard plow (MP), which involves deeper soil tillage and turning of the soil to provide enough loose soil for proper tuberization. Although tillage with the MP allows better potato seedbed preparation and lower weed pressure, it is also associated with increased soil compaction, soil aggregate destruction, and increased soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization. The objective of this four-year (2019–2022) study conducted in 14 commercial fields was to compare the use of MP with primary non-inversion shallow tillage (ST) in terms of their effect on selected soil health indicators, soil moisture, potato petiole nitrate concentration, potato yield, and specific gravity. Commercial fields ranged from 1.5 ha to 19 ha where the main field was split in half, with one side tilled using MP (22.5–30 cm plowing depth) and the other half using ST (15–30 cm plowing depth). Soil and plant tissue samples were taken within four sub-replicates (91 m 2 ) created per each treatment per each site and three to four sites were used as replicates per each year. Compared to MP, ST increased active carbon by an average of 9%, soil respiration by an average of 26%, and aggregate stability by an average of 8%. Biological N availability (BNA) increased by an average of 20% with ST, and the effect was statistically significant in three out of four years. Soil moisture at 20 cm depth tended to be higher with MP than ST in three out of four years. Although not statistically significant, when averaged across four years, potato petiole nitrate concentrations were 5% and 12% higher with ST than MP in samples collected at the flowering and post-potato flowering stages, respectively. Total and marketable potato yields, along with specific gravity, were comparable for the two tillage regimes. Signs of soil improvement were observed at the early stages of ST adoption. Marketable yield was negatively correlated with the soil nitrate levels measured during the growing season but was positively correlated with active carbon, aggregate stability, and soil moisture. Future studies could compare both tillage regimes over multiple growing seasons to assess their impacts over a full cycle of rotation. The novelty of the present study was that it was conducted in real-life conditions across large growers’ fields with different conditions and across four years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Potato ResearchSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207