MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401528515 · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107748

Kyanite microstructural and microchemical characteristics reveal differences in growth, deformation and chemical modification: A case study from the Paleoproterozoic suture zone of South Harris, NW Scotland

2024· article· en· W4401528515 on OpenAlexaff
Eleanore Blereau, Sandra Piazolo, Patrick Trimby, Etienne Skrzypek

Bibliographic record

VenueLithos · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsHorizon 2020European Commission
KeywordsKyaniteGeologyFibrous jointGeochemistryDeformation (meteorology)Metamorphic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on petrological association, cathodoluminescence (CL), trace element signatures and orientation relationships, two generations of kyanite are distinguished in a high temperature, high pressure garnet-biotite-aluminosilicate bearing migmatite of South Harris, NW Scotland. The migmatite shows a garnet and biotite rich domain ( Grt-Bt domain) which is cut at a low angle by a dominantly coarse-grained plagioclase-quartz leucosome. In addition, a fine-grained plagioclase-quartz-kyanite domain ( Plag-Qtz-Ky domain ) is present intercalated with the Grt-Bt domain and subparallel to the plagioclase-quartz domain. Type 1 kyanite is coarse grained and associated with Bt clusters and garnet within the Grt-Bt domain . It grew relatively early, syn - to post-garnet growth, in a suprasolidus environment resulting in crystallographically determined oscillatory CL and trace element zoning. Grains record evidence of progressive deformation in the crystal plastic regime, where deformation is accommodated by dislocation glide, climb and deformation twinning. The dominant activated slip system is (100)<001> with minor component of <100>, while deformation twins show a ∼ 180° rotation around ∼<001> axis and a twin plane near (001). Grains appear to be impervious to deformation induced diffusion with all zoning remaining sharp despite crystal plastic deformation. Grains in direct contact with the Plag-Qtz-Ky domain show late modification of the CL and trace element signature suggesting melt-mediated interface-coupled dissolution-precipitation reaction. This modification resulted in crosscutting lobate high trace element regions and irregular rims with low Cr and V content. These rims show similar CL and trace element characteristics as Type 2 kyanite which are exclusively seen within the Plag-Qtz-Ky domain suggesting that Type 2 grains are cogenetic with Type 1 rims. Type 2 grains are finer grained than Type 1 grains and show near uniform CL and trace element distributions with rare oscillatory zoned and relatively higher Cr & V bright cores. Type 2 show either no or very localized internal deformation features. However, they exhibit a clear shape preferred orientation which coincides with a crystallographic preferred orientation where the longest shape axis is parallel to <001>. We propose that Type 2 kyanite grains underwent melt-present deformation by rigid body rotation in an externally derived melt with different trace element chemistry than the host rock. This melt thus interacted chemically by melt-mediated interface-coupled dissolution-precipitation reactions with the surrounding rocks forming the Type 1 rims. Our study shows detailed analysis of kyanite is an important tool for giving constraints on the deformation, P–T and melting history of high-grade metamorphic rocks and migmatites. • Two kyanite types defined by microstructure, paragenesis, EBSD, CL & trace elements. • T1 is from local partial melting, T2 is related to externally derived partial melt. • External melt modifies CL signal and trace elements in T1 kyanite. • Kyanite is resistant to crystal plastic deformation induced trace element diffusion. • Detailed investigation of kyanite yield independent process & evolution constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLithosSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207