MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401538922 · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2400

Physical activity among patients with knee osteoarthritis during the COVID-19 pandemic

2024· article· en· W4401538922 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Bahi, Laila Lahlou, Sofia KADA, N. Benabdelmalek, I. Ghozlani, M. Erraoui

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMedicineWOMACRheumatologyBody mass indexPhysical therapyInternal medicineVisual analogue scaleObesityPopulationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the level of physical activity among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A total of 55 patients, aged 40 to 69 years, diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis based on the criteria set by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or Kellgren and Lawrence classification, were included in this study. These patients were seen at the diagnostic center of the Souss Massa University Hospital for rheumatology consultation. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while knee osteoarthritis severity was evaluated using the Western Ontario McMaster University of Osteoarthritis score (WOMAC). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short version was used to assess physical activity levels. Results: The mean age of the patients was 54.6 +/- 7.2 years, with a majority of females (90.9%, n=50). The average body mass index (BMI) was 31.3 [24-39], indicating obesity in 92.3% (n=48) of the patients. The mean duration of osteoarthritis progression in the study population was 6.3 +/- 6.5 years. Radiographic analysis revealed stage II knee osteoarthritis in 38.2% (n=13) of the patients and stage III in 29.4% (n=10). No significant difference in VAS scores was observed between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. The average WOMAC score was 52.2 +/- 18. The mean IPAQ total activity score was 1357 metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-min/week, and patients spent an average of 342 minutes per day in sedentary activities. Regarding physical activity levels during the past 7 days, 58.2% of patients engaged in moderate activity, 36.4% had low activity, and only 5.5% reported intense activity. Conclusion: Among the study participants, 52.7% of women and 5.5% of men were classified as having moderate physical activity levels. In univariate analysis, the WOMAC score was found to be the only factor significantly associated with the level of physical activity measured by the IPAQ categorical score (intense, moderate, low activity). A positive and statistically significant correlation (p<0.001) was observed, indicating that as the WOMAC score increased, physical activity levels decreased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Advanced Research and ReviewsSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207