MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401539904 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3442929

NOMA-Enhanced Cooperative Relaying Systems in Drone-Enabled IoV: Capacity Analysis and Height Optimization

2024· article· en· W4401539904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsDroneNomaComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringComputer networkTelecommunications link

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the drone as a cooperative relay (CR) can improve the connectivity of Internet of Vehicles (IoV) on highways in remote areas. Meanwhile, considering limited spectrum resources, non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) is regarded as a promising approach for increasing spectrum efficiency and the channel capacity of IoV. Motivated by the above, this paper investigates the application of the cooperative relaying system (CRS) and NOMA in drone-enabled IoV. Specifically, we propose a NOMA-enhanced CRS in drone-enabled IoV for spatially multiplexed transmissions, where the base station is allowed to transmit two different data symbols simultaneously to associated vehicles. Next, in order to analyze the capacity, we adopt the incomplete Gamma function and Taylor expansion of Bessel function to derive the closed-form expression of average data rates. Then, to simplify the calculation, we provide an approximate expression by using the Gauss-Chebyshev integral. Afterwards, to fully exploit the advantages of the CR, the CR height is optimized by employing the Steffensen method, which has second-order convergence without calculating the derivative. In order to apply to real scenarios, we extend the considered model to accommodate large-scale networks by using the stochastic geometric method. Finally, the simulation results show the accuracy of the obtained approximate results, where the performance gap is 1.6%. Moreover, the NOMA-enhanced CRS using the proposed CR height optimization scheme outperforms the current works in terms of the sum data rate. Furthermore, utilizing the Steffensen method can reduce the running time by 26.3% in comparison with the Newton method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it