QF-LCA dataset: Quantum Field Lens Coding Algorithm for system state simulation and strong predictions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantum field lens coding algorithm (QF-LCA) dataset is useful for simulating systems and predict system events with high probability. This is achieved by computing QF lens distance-based variables associated to event probabilities from the dataset produced by field lenses that encode system states on a quantum level. The probability of a state transition (ST), doubles in prediction values at the decoding step, e.g., ST probabilities of P ≥ 1 / 3 into P ≥ 2 / 3 based on a single field (SF) transform into a quantum double-field (QDF). This transformation doubles the ST probability space via the field's scalar κ , in a published QDF method article. A QDF, as a double-field computation (DFC) model, simulates thermodynamic systems in predicting events by producing datasets from a QF-LCA, using laser cooling methods relative to high energy systems. The dataset can be used to, e.g., train quantum algorithms via quantum artificial intelligence (QAI) for a QF-LCA user. The user then decides after the algorithm predicts and suggests an efficient energy path for the system to choose. For example, an N -particle system simulated as a heat engine, by QAI classifier(s), predicts and reroutes particle energy paths on a logarithmic input-output scale. To determine system's energy change, the QDF lens code (DFC) measures entanglement entropy (EE). The algorithm's classification of EE values distinguishes entangled states in the system. The QF-LCA program employs the dataset to achieve an automated prediction and classification method, rather than dataset's manual use and analysis by the user. As the system evolves in its distribution of states, those particles not reaching a desired energy state (a target state or TS), i.e., the probability of observing a ground or excited state (GS or ES) outcome at the decoding step, can be rerouted by the heat engine to satisfy a TS outcome. This establishes a GS or ES energy profile to access and classify states by a classifier. The data points (qubits) in this profile are inverse distance-based and labelled for a specific class. After learning the profile, the classifier decodes and predicts the next system state. A QDF AI game “ Alice & Bob's Quantum Doubles, ” is developed to validate the dataset as the P ’s map for a classical/quantum prediction where the P ’s of states and the user's P ’s correlate in their value difference, Δ P . Dataset validation results are mapped to an intelligent decision simulator (IDS) as a QAI map. This maximizes system efficiency on a TS by EE of energy states (distributed in the system). Future additions to the dataset from the QAI map program can improve quantum algorithms to determine which particles of the system participate in a phase transition after state prediction. QF-LCA applications are in data science, security, forensics, particle physics, etc., such as retrieving or reconstructing information by distinguishing particle states from an evidence sample. Examples are, reconstruct damaged DNA strands of cells to predict a virus's TS, or cancer cell, its spread and growth against healthy cells, identify forged documents from genuine based on QDF's P values, and so on.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".