Investigating orthogonal frequency division multiplexing using high‐power LED for visible light communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Spectrally efficient 16 quadrature amplitude modulation‐orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (QAM‐OFDM) system using specifications of commercially available high‐power phosphorous coated LED (PLED) is proposed in this study. To address the challenges of signal attenuation and limited bandwidth, systems integrated with a band pass filter (BPF) after the photodetector and optical preamplifier. The effect of BPF bandwidth and preamplifier gain on the performance of 16 QAM‐OFDM system have been investigated. Results demonstrated that 375 MHz bandwidth evaluated from 1.5 × symbol rate, offered an optimum performance achieving minimum bit‐error‐rate of 3.05 × 10 −4 . For preamplifier gain of 20 dB, we achieved a maximum distance of 3 m which is limited to 1.5 m for lower gain values. With BPF‐optimized bandwidth and a preamplifier gain of 20 dB, we have achieved a data rate of 5 Gbps for maximum distance up to 2 m while considering the super‐forward‐error‐correction limit of 1.863 × 10 −2 . With data rate of 6 and 7 Gbps, the distance lower down to 1.8 and 1.5 m, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".