MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401548804 · doi:10.1080/17445302.2024.2387509

Innovations and challenges in marine steels for polar icebreaker manufacturing – a comprehensive review

2024· review· en· W4401548804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueShips and Offshore Structures · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsChantiers Chibougamau (Canada)Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShipbuildingWeldabilityArcticWeldingThe arcticAutomotive industryMarine engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringGeologyOceanographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review paper thoroughly investigates the challenges associated with constructing polar icebreakers, given the increasing feasibility of Arctic navigation attributed to global warming. The strategic significance of the Northern Sea Route in global trade, potentially reducing the Asia-Europe transit distance by about one-third, underscores the growing importance of polar-class vessels in Arctic navigation. Our research emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable steel grades considering strength, toughness, and weldability. The paper investigates the influence of ductile-brittle transition temperature on ship failures and evaluates different marine steels' tensile properties and fatigue behavior. Additionally, it reviews welding techniques and explores advanced methods, including wire arc additive manufacturing, to improve precision and efficiency in shipbuilding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it