MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401549807 · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107752

U–Pb–Hf and morphological evolution of zircon from granites associated with world-class tungsten skarn deposits in the northern Canadian Cordillera

2024· article· en· W4401549807 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kirsten L. Rasmussen, Hendrik Falck, Yan Luo, D. Graham Pearson, Pilar Lecumberri–Sanchez

Bibliographic record

VenueLithos · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconSkarnGeologyGeochemistryTungstenGeochronologyWorld classPaleontologyFluid inclusionsHydrothermal circulationMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The northern Canadian Cordillera is the most significant tungsten district in North America. Here, high-grade tungsten skarn deposits are associated with small, reduced, high-K calc-alkaline, S-type biotite granite plutons belonging to the 102–96 Ma Tungsten plutonic suite (TPS). A detailed U–Pb–Hf and morphological study of magmatic zircon from plutons in the southern half of the TPS belt was undertaken to better understand magmatic processes leading to the generation of the associated tungsten deposits. Antecrystic zircon from the TPS plutons began crystallizing during a transpressional regime ca. 117 Ma, suggesting the TPS magmas were active for up to 21 Myr prior to their upper crustal emplacement and final crystallization. This prolonged magmatic activity necessitates a magma origin in long-lived, deep crustal magma chambers. Hafnium isotopic compositions in zircon for the southern TPS as a whole form a non-radiogenic, univariate, and relatively wide ranging population (ε Hf i = −17.6 ± 4.5), but U–Pb–Hf trends become apparent when the data are sub-divided into sample groups with similar age, zircon morphology, and geographic location. These evolutionary trends in magmatic zircon are most simply explained by interactions between the parent melt and dissolving inherited zircon grains. This, along with changing zircon morphology, is consistent with gradual cooling and crystallization pathways exhibited by S-type magmas. Differing evolutionary trends in the U–Pb–Hf isotopic data between sample groups, however, suggest there were multiple magma batches that evolved independently, possibly in separate pockets within large, deep magma chambers. Zircon morphologies also suggest some grains in all sample groups were equilibrated with hotter and more alkaline magmas, although there is no textural or compositional evidence in the zircon for mixing of magmas with widely different compositions. An unconstrained inversion of local aeromagnetic data indicates reduced batholiths could be present 4–6 + km below the surface and that the plutons are apophysies to (or, higher level injections from) these deeper bodies. Although these batholiths can only be short-term holding chambers for magmas ascending from deep crustal levels, they may have been important for the segregation of mineralizing fluids. Since no single magmatic evolutionary pattern in the unaltered TPS plutons can be definitively linked to tungsten mineralization, pulses of mineralizing fluid may have been derived instead from the underlying batholiths. The 20 + Myr duration of deep magmatic activity exhibited by the TPS is similar to timeframes suggested for magmas associated with tungsten deposits in southern China, and may have allowed extended fractionation of a large volume of crustally derived magma to concentrate tungsten into late-stage melts. The emplacement of upper crustal batholiths and plutons in both regions during or following a transition to an extensional tectonic regime suggests the relaxed geodynamic regime may have been important in the ascension of metal-rich magmas and (or) fluids, ultimately resulting globally important tungsten deposits. • Magmatic activity began 21 Myr prior to pluton emplacement and mineralization. • The plutons are late-stage magmas sourced from deep crustal magma chambers. • Individual intrusive phases were derived from separately evolving magmas. • Magma evolution was complex, as evidenced by the lack of systematic patterns. • No U–Pb–Hf–morphology pattern is definitive for associated mineralization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLithosSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207