Neuropsychological and behavioural outcomes in epilepsy involving the insula: A scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: In patients with epilepsy, the insula has been increasingly recognized as a common site of seizures. There is growing interest in understanding the cognitive and psychological consequences of insular epilepsy to help provide clinical recommendations to support patient’s cognitive and psychosocial functioning, and to help identify candidates for epilepsy resective surgery. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the cognitive and behavioural characteristics associated with insular epilepsy in children and adults. Method: A systematic search was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis -Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Eligible studies reported on a neuropsychological or behavioural outcome, using standardized or research-based psychological measures, in individuals with insular epilepsy, (i.e. the seizure focus and/or surgical resection included the insula), and a comparison group. After duplicates were removed, 2,423 citations were identified from the search, and 39 studies were included in the scoping review. Results: Across the included studies, intellectual/global cognitive functioning and language were most often evaluated. Lower functioning was found across multiple cognitive and behavioural processes in pediatric and adult patients with insular epilepsy. Following resective surgery involving the insula, behavioural and cognitive outcomes are general stable. Conclusions: The results of this scoping review further neuropsychologists’ knowledge of the cognitive and behavioural outcomes of insular seizures prior to and following surgical treatment. These results can aid in counselling patients of the potential cognitive dysfunctions, and aid with treatment planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".