Long‐term neurodevelopmental outcomes following liver transplantation for metabolic disease‐a single centre experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study describes the neurodevelopmental outcome of children with urea cycle disorders (UCD) and organic acidemias (OA) preliver transplant (LT), 1-year, and 3-years post-LT. We performed a retrospective chart review of children with OA or UCD transplanted between January 2014 and December 2021. Standardized motor and cognitive assessment scores were collected from children who had ≥1 motor/cognitive assessment at any timepoint. Pre-LT brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was graded. Associations between demographic/medical variables and neurodevelopmental outcomes were explored. Twenty-six children (64% male) underwent LT at a median age of 1.4 (interquartile range 0.71, 3.84) years. Fifteen (58%) had a UCD diagnosis, 14 (54%) required dialysis for hyperammonemia, and 10 (42%) had seizures typically around diagnosis. The proportion of children with gross motor scores >1 standard deviation (SD) below the mean increased across timepoints, and ≥50% demonstrated general intellect scores >2 SD below the mean at each timepoint. The following significant associations were noted: UCD diagnoses with lower general intellect scores (p = 0.019); arginosuccinate lyase deficiency diagnosis with lower visual motor scores at 3-years post-LT (p = 0.035); a history of seizures pre-LT with lower general intellect (>2SD below the mean) at 3-years post-LT (p = 0.020); dialysis pre-LT with lower motor scores (>1 SD below the mean) at 1-year post-LT (p = 0.039); pre-emptive LT with higher general intellect scores at 3-years post-LT (p = 0.001). MRI gradings were not associated with developmental scores. In our single centre study, children with UCD or OA had a higher prevalence of developmental impairment post-LT compared to population norms. Earlier screening, pre-emptive transplant, and rehabilitation may optimize long-term outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".