MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401580491 · doi:10.2514/1.j064079

Transient Three-Dimensional Measurement of Ice Crystal Accretion Using a Plenoptic Camera

2024· article· en· W4401580491 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Eberhart, Stefan Loehle, Felix Grigat, Jonathan Connolly, Matthew McGilvray, David R. H. Gillespie

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInnovate UK
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Ice crystalsAccretion (finance)OpticsMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring the three-dimensional formation of ice layers on airfoils during icing wind tunnel experiments is extremely challenging. For the first time, this paper demonstrates the use of a single plenoptic camera to perform transient, nonintrusive in situ measurements of ice crystal accretion. Experiments have been conducted in the Altitude Icing Wind Tunnel at the National Research Council of Canada under different icing conditions to assess the potential of the new technique. Using the camera in a close-up configuration, the results show the evolution of the three-dimensional shape of the accreted ice in high spatial and temporal resolution and in absolute metric units. The computed surface meshes allow for a detailed analysis in terms of ice shape, surface area, and ice volume. Posttest shapes are compared to measurements taken using a commercial laser scanner. Although not rated for ice surfaces, this device is used as a reference to compare the detailed surface structure after registering the data sets. The results of the two methods are in good agreement and show a mean relative deviation of the plenoptic camera of about 0.15 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA JournalSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207