Habitat characteristics shaping zoantharians’ distribution at intertidal habitats of the Canary Islands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ocean warming is facilitating the proliferation of zoantharians worldwide due to their thermophilic affinities. However, other anthropogenic factors, such as declining water quality, have been appointed to favour the occurrence of zoantharians dominated areas and barrens. Subtropical and tropical intertidal habitats are especially vulnerable to zoantharians outbreaks due to the progressive increase in ocean temperature and because it is where most human pressure is concentrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the abundance of intertidal zoantharians populations, related to habitat characteristics (rugosity and submerged substrate) and the presence of other benthic organisms, such as sessile invertebrates and macroalgae. Number and coverage of zoantharian colonies were recorded in transects (20 × 4 m) along 25 intertidal rocky platforms of the Canarian Archipelago, and photographic techniques in quadrats were used to examine the relationships between the percentage of substrate cover of zoantharians, macroalgae and sessile invertebrates by means of correlations analyses. Results indicated that high levels of rugosity favour the abundance and coverage of Palythoa aff. clavata and Zoanthus pulchellus , and the proportion of submerged substrate was also important in determining Zoanthus coverages. The presence of extensive macroalgae communities was seen to reduce zoantharian coverages, being the only sessile organisms that were able to outcompete them for space in the Canary Islands. Thus, this study provided valuable information about patterns of abundances and coverages of intertidal zoantharians useful for future monitoring of intertidal populations of zoantharians in Canary Islands and their interaction with surrounding marine organisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".