Nonstationary longitudinal autoregressive mixed model for count data with measurement error in covariates: Estimation and asymptotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several methods have been proposed in the literature for computing unbiased and efficient estimates of the parameters of generalized linear models when the covariates are measured with error. However, to our knowledge, no documented research on computational techniques for parameter estimation currently exist in the literature when the data is a longitudinal count data influenced by an unobservable latent variable and observable covariates that are measured with error. In this paper, we propose a nonstationary conditionally Poisson mixed model for such data and develop unbiased estimating equations with iterative methods for computing estimates of the effect of the covariates, variance of the latent variable, and the correlation index parameter. The performance of the iterative methods is examined through extensive simulation studies. The results show that the methods performed well when the magnitude of the measurement error is not so large as to dominate or mask the effect of the true covariates. Using observed longitudinal count data on the number of patents awarded to 168 firms in the United States from 1974 to 1979 along with associated covariate information on the type of firm, log of the book value of capital in 1972 and research and development (R & D) expenditures we have demonstrated how the methods proposed in this paper can be applied to a real data. In addition, we derive the influence function of the estimator of the covariate effect and discuss the asymptotic properties of the estimator. Journal of Statistical Research 2024, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 151-180.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.036 | 0.100 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".