Classifying intrusive and strongly metamorphosed rock units: CLASS—a cooperative lithodemic and stratigraphic system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We review currently available Canadian and international lithostratigraphic and lithodemic schemes and find most of them inadequate for classifying intrusive and strongly metamorphosed rocks of Canada and beyond. A new system is proposed, one that unifies, complements, and extends components of the revised North American Stratigraphic Code, the British Geological Survey Rock Unit Classification System of 2021, and the International Stratigraphic Guide of 1999. This new Cooperative Lithodemic and Stratigraphic System (CLASS) is intended to serve as a practical guide to geoscientists who need to classify and report on lithodemic units in North America and has broad applicability to other jurisdictions. It is built with database management practices in mind and employs the concept of inheritance of root characteristics between seven formal rock unit ranks, which will allow incorporation of the scheme into compact object-oriented and relational databases designed for purpose. Broad application of CLASS, especially to historically problematic lithodemic units, should help to foster jurisdictional interoperability, data sharing, global compilations, and thematic studies. At the heart of this proposed system is a subdivision and accompanying nomenclature that allows classification of rocks into seven formal ranks. Following the well-established lithostratigraphic supergroup, group, subgroup, formation, member, submember, and bed approach, CLASS proposes three classes of lithodemic subdivisions for formally naming lithodemic rock units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it