MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards Development of an Interactive Mobile Application for Teaching The UNSDG

2024· article· en· W4401612401 on OpenAlex
Darren Singh, Raafat Khankan, Yousaf Ijaz, Damith Tennakoon, Mojgan Jadidi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
Topic21st Century Education and Governance
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersYork University
KeywordsCurriculumAction (physics)Computer scienceProcess (computing)SAFERBest practiceSustainable developmentScale (ratio)MultimediaPsychologyPedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In aim of a better, inclusive, accessible, and safer future, educational institutions are committed to integrating the United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) into their curriculum design and course delivery.Traditionally, a plain literary review of these goals has been adopted by educators.This tends to leave students wondering what a realistic scenario would look like, and how they would approach an urgent call to action.To encourage thrive to learn and delve into action, a gamified reflective and immersive process would be more sought by learners instead of reviewing the definition of goals and their description without any tangible practice.To do so, The York University SDG Uphold (YU-SDG-UP) app was designed to immerse students into a world of those scenarios, where their responses are recorded and graded on an impact scale.This provides an interactive approach which is certain to influence the user's understanding of the SDG, and their attitude towards a sustainable, inclusive, diverse, and equitable future.This is accomplished through developing a mobile application hosting a virtual world with a global health score, where the user interacts with a scenario-based problem-solving framework.Scenarios are presented in text-based descriptions, and followed by a multiple-choice list of actions, all of which hold a weighted impact on the user's global health score.The user is intended to explore these scenarios with the objective of claiming the best possible score through their chosen actions, embracing practical education through trial and error.This activity is anticipated to surpass the traditional means of teaching sustainable development through slideshow presentations, or at least reinforce that knowledge through a virtual decision-making experience.Students can practice their problemsolving skills under realistic conditions and constraints, while understanding the significance of their decisions towards sustainable living.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic21st Century Education and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207