MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards Development of an Interactive Mobile Application for Teaching The UNSDG

2024· article· en· W4401612401 on OpenAlexafffund
Darren Singh, Raafat Khankan, Yousaf Ijaz, Damith Tennakoon, Mojgan Jadidi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
Topic21st Century Education and Governance
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersYork University
KeywordsCurriculumAction (physics)Computer scienceProcess (computing)SAFERBest practiceSustainable developmentScale (ratio)MultimediaPsychologyPedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In aim of a better, inclusive, accessible, and safer future, educational institutions are committed to integrating the United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) into their curriculum design and course delivery.Traditionally, a plain literary review of these goals has been adopted by educators.This tends to leave students wondering what a realistic scenario would look like, and how they would approach an urgent call to action.To encourage thrive to learn and delve into action, a gamified reflective and immersive process would be more sought by learners instead of reviewing the definition of goals and their description without any tangible practice.To do so, The York University SDG Uphold (YU-SDG-UP) app was designed to immerse students into a world of those scenarios, where their responses are recorded and graded on an impact scale.This provides an interactive approach which is certain to influence the user's understanding of the SDG, and their attitude towards a sustainable, inclusive, diverse, and equitable future.This is accomplished through developing a mobile application hosting a virtual world with a global health score, where the user interacts with a scenario-based problem-solving framework.Scenarios are presented in text-based descriptions, and followed by a multiple-choice list of actions, all of which hold a weighted impact on the user's global health score.The user is intended to explore these scenarios with the objective of claiming the best possible score through their chosen actions, embracing practical education through trial and error.This activity is anticipated to surpass the traditional means of teaching sustainable development through slideshow presentations, or at least reinforce that knowledge through a virtual decision-making experience.Students can practice their problemsolving skills under realistic conditions and constraints, while understanding the significance of their decisions towards sustainable living.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic21st Century Education and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207