Efficient and regioselective synthesis of <i>ortho</i> -diiodinated homobenzylic alcohol derivatives: <i>in silico</i> evaluation as potential anticancer IDO/TDO inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
. This shows that these compounds potentially interact with IDO and TDO and consequently cause the inhibition of these targets. Moreover, the BFE results also revealed that this combination suggests that the gas-phase interactions between the components are favorable, but the solvation of the system is unfavorable. In the context of binding, it further means that the protein and ligand have attractive forces when in close proximity as seen in the gas phase, but when solvated, the system experiences an increase in free energy due to interactions with the solvent. This further implies that the binding might be enthalpically favorable due to favorable gas-phase interactions but entropically unfavorable due to unfavorable solvation effects. Our analysis shows that our designed compounds have unmatched pharmacological potential, far surpassing previously reported compounds. This highlights the innovative nature of these derivatives and sets a new benchmark in IDO and TDO drug discovery, indicating their significant potential as effective anticancer inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".