Evaluating the Behavior of Bauxite Tailings Dewatering in Decanter Centrifuges
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depending on the ore quality, a washing process can be conducted with the bauxite, which basically consists of scrubbing the ore and screening in order to increase the available alumina grade, i.e., the alumina extractable using the Bayer Process, and reduce the impurity content. Tailings are usually disposed of in a tailings dam in the form of a slurry, which is a mixture of solid particles and liquid, consisting mainly of ultra-fine kaolinite, making the dewatering operation challenging. To reduce the environmental impact, mining companies are studying alternative methods to dewater the tailings, and different dewatering methods are available worldwide. The use of new technologies to dewater the tailings has contributed to facing the challenges of achieving sustainable development with their disposal. The decanter centrifuges are already an option for operations for the Canadian oil sands, gold ore in Peru, and nickel in New Caledonia; they are also being tested for iron ore in Brazil. In the present work, bauxite dewatering using the decanter centrifuge was evaluated to understand more about the behavior of these materials and to investigate the effects of various process parameters on the solid recovery and solid content of the flows, using three different kinds of equipment. The results indicated that decanter centrifuges can be used to achieve a high concentration of solids in the cake, with values ranging from 60% to 80% solids per weight and a great clarification in the liquid phase (centrate) from 0 to 6% solids per weight, values which mean the solid phase is suitable for reutilization in the processing circuit. Additionally, the present work provides a better understanding of how different solid contents feed can affect the behavior of the equipment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it