Hubungan Antara Dukungan Sosial Teman Sebaya Dengan <i>Quarter Life Crisis</i> Pada <i>Fresh Graduate </i>Universitas Negeri Padang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis adalah kebingungan masa depan setelah kuliah. Masalah yang dihadapi berupa masalah karir, pekerjaan, hubungan dengan keluarga, dan lawan jenis. Adapun faktor yang diduga dapat mempengaruhi quarter life crisis ialah dukungan sosial teman sebaya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada hubungan dukungan sosial teman sebaya dengan quarter life crisis. Hipotesis dalam penelitian ini adalah ada hubungan antara dukungan sosial teman sebaya dengan quarter life crisis pada fresh graduate di Universitas Negeri Padang. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah fresh graduate Universitas Negeri Padang sebanyak 99 orang. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan Teknik pengambilan sampel purposive sampling. Pengambilan data menggunakan skala dukungan sosial teman sebaya dan quarter life crisis. Hasil analisis data korelasi product moment r= 0,260 serta p= 0,009. Hal ini menunjukkan adanya hubungan yang positif serta signifikan antara dukungan sosial teman sebaya dan quarter life crisis pada fresh graduate Universitas Negeri Padang.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".