MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401629182 · doi:10.1063/5.0215366

The interplay between gravity and centrifugal forces in the continuous circular hydraulic jump

2024· article· en· W4401629182 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdelkader Baayoun, Roger E. Khayat

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersRES’EAU-WaterNET
KeywordsPhysicsHydraulic jumpJumpMechanicsCentrifugal forceClassical mechanicsGravity forceStratified flowsFlow (mathematics)Stratified flowTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow of a thin film over a rotating disk is crucial in many industrial applications, such as spin coating and jet cooling. Accurate prediction of hydrodynamic features is essential for optimizing these processes. In this study, we examine the vertical downward impingement of a circular Newtonian liquid jet on a horizontally rotating disk, focusing on two distinct regimes based on the rotation level. For a stationary disk and low rotation speed, a continuous hydraulic jump is formed, while increased rotation speed leads to the transformation of the jump into a hump. A composite mean-field thin-film approach is utilized to analyze the flow dynamics in different regions of the domain. The effects of gravity and rotation are considered by developing a model to capture the continuous jump and vortex structure. The influence of rotation on the laminar boundary layer near impingement is found to be negligible. Specific conditions for gravity and rotation are established to differentiate between the jump and hump regimes. The model is validated for both regimes against existing experiment. In the jump regime, the flow transitions from predominantly azimuthal near the disk to predominantly radial toward the free surface, while in the hump regime, the flow maintains an azimuthal character around the hump. The vortex associated with the jump diminishes with increasing rotation speed, indicating the occurrence of a type-0 jump on a rotating disk. For small gravity, the vortex does not form in conjunction with the jump at any rotation level. In the case of small rotation, large gravity, and large disk size, the film exhibits a hydraulic jump near impingement followed by a sharp rise in thickness near the edge of the disk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207