MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401631702 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16106

Efficient Computations of Interesting Paths

2024· dissertation· en· W4401631702 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Raphael Vicuna

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopological and Geometric Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsCompleteness (order theory)Computer scienceComputationAlgorithmApproximation algorithmClass (philosophy)Directed acyclic graphTheoretical computer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a high dimensional dataset and a function of interest defined on all points, the Mapper algorithm outputs a topologically accurate summary of any numerical dataset.This summary helps identify subpopulations with interesting properties.These subpopulations typically appear as cycles, disconnected components and flares (i.e., branching paths).The discovery of these subpopulations is unique to the Mapper algorithm.This motivates its use for data mining and dataset identification.The interestingness score of a path is defined as a sum of its edge weights multiplied by a nonlinear function of the edge ranks.Continuing the work on interesting paths by Kalyanaraman, Kamruzzaman and Krishnamoorthy, we consider the graph form of the output of the Mapper algorithm and study three optimization problems to maximize the total interestingness score of the flares: the Max-IP problem, the k-IP problem, and the IP problem.The solution to these problems leads to automatic detection of subpopulations of interest, which greatly facilitates the use of the Mapper algorithm to practitioners.The Max-IP problem is solved in directed acyclic graphs, but we extend the solution to a special class of graphs which is common for the Mapper algorithm.For the k-IP problem, where the number of edges in each path is fixed to k, we show the NP-completeness proof given by Kalyanaraman, Kamruzzaman and Krishnamoorthy has gaps.We give a new NPcompleteness proof of the k-IP problem for k g 4. We design three approximation algorithms, where the best approximation bound is 3 k+1+ϵ , where ϵ > 0. We also design three exact algorithms with varying assumptions, namely: no assumptions, limited graph diameter and constant output size.For the IP problem, where the number of edges in each path is not fixed, we give a proof of the NP-completeness of the IP problem.We design exact algorithms and 9/20-approximate algorithms, using various heuristics.iii Topology is the science of fundamental pattern and structural relationships of event constellations.-R. Buckminster

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207