Dynamic Expansion and Contraction of Multiple Sclerosis T2-Weighted Hyperintense Lesions Are Present below the Threshold of Visual Perception
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The study of T2-weighted hyperintense lesions resulting from autoimmune inflammatory injury and associated volumes within the CNS remains fundamental to the diagnosis and disease surveillance of multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the dynamic changes of individual T2-weighted hyperintense MS lesions on MRI and hypothesized that variations may be present below the threshold of visual perception when evaluating longitudinal data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of people with MS, incorporating data from three consecutive MRI time points acquired within a single academic center. All included MRI studies lacked formal imaging interpretations of newly enlarging or contracting T2-weighted hyperintensities. Well defined, non-coalescing, individual T2-weighted hyperintense lesions were targeted. A total of 8-12 lesions were randomly selected in a blinded fashion at MRI time point 1 and 3-dimensional lesion volumes followed over MRI time points 2 and 3. The impact of treatment on lesion expansion and relationship to brain MRI advancement, patient-reported progression of disease, and physician-identified progression was also studied. RESULTS: The study cohort was comprised of 115 people (81 (70.4%) female; mean disease duration of 6.62 years(y) (standard deviation: 6.68y)) who were primarily White (79.1%). A total of 1,426 focal T2-weighted hyperintense MS lesions were identified on MRI time point 1 and longitudinally followed over MRI time points 2 and 3. In the evaluation of raw changes in individual T2-weighted hyperintense lesion volumes from MRI time point 1 to MRI time point 2, a similar number of individuals were observed with predominantly expanding (49/115; 42.6%) or contracting (51/115; 44.3%) lesions. However, the majority of lesions expanded in volume (48/115; 41.7%) versus those that contracted (45/115; 39.1%) when evaluating MRI time point 3 to time point 1. Those individuals not on active treatment had a 67.15% reduction in the odds of more individual lesions predominantly contracting in volume relative to those on low-efficacy disease modifying therapy treatment (95% CI=[-83.89, -33.01], p=0.0008) and 74.02% reduction for those on high-efficacy treatment (95% CI=[-87.37%,-46.56%], p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic changes in T2-weighted hyperintense lesions are abundant, occurring below the threshold of visual perception and are present more frequently in untreated individuals. ABBREVIATIONS: MS = multiple sclerosis; DMT = disease modifying therapy; 2D = 2-dimensional; 3D = 3-dimensional; LMS = Lambda, Mu, and Sigma
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".