MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401634325 · doi:10.61838/kman.jprfc.2.4.3

Perceptions of Discipline and Punishment in Families from Diverse Cultural Backgrounds

2024· article· en· W4401634325 on OpenAlex
Haixin Qiu, Farzaneh Mardani, Taf Kunorubwe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychosociological Research in Family and Culture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPunishment (psychology)PerceptionSociologyCriminologyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of discipline and punishment among families from diverse cultural backgrounds. By understanding these perceptions, the study aimed to provide insights into how cultural norms, individual experiences, and societal frameworks influence disciplinary practices within different familial contexts. Methods: This qualitative research utilized semi-structured interviews to collect data from 23 participants of varied cultural backgrounds. The participants were recruited through community centers, cultural organizations, and social media platforms. Interviews were conducted using a guide developed from existing literature, focusing on definitions of discipline, acceptable and unacceptable practices, and cultural influences. Data were analyzed using NVivo software, employing thematic analysis to identify common themes and patterns across the interviews. Results: The study identified three main themes: perceptions of discipline, experiences with punishment, and cultural contexts. Participants generally defined discipline as corrective action aimed at guiding behavior and fostering respect, responsibility, and self-discipline. Non-physical methods, such as time-outs and verbal warnings, were preferred, while physical punishment was widely rejected. Cultural traditions, religious beliefs, and community norms significantly influenced these practices. Experiences with punishment revealed generational shifts towards less physical punishment, with emotional impacts ranging from fear to acceptance. The influence of extended family, migration challenges, and legal frameworks were also highlighted, underscoring the complex interplay of cultural and societal factors in shaping disciplinary practices. Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of culturally sensitive approaches to discipline and punishment within families. Effective parenting programs and policies should integrate diverse cultural traditions while promoting non-physical disciplinary methods. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the cultural dimensions of disciplinary practices, offering valuable insights for parents, educators, and policymakers aiming to support the well-being and healthy development of children in multicultural contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it