MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401637672 · doi:10.26685/urncst.596

The Role of Endogenous Circular RNAs in Glioblastoma Treatment Resistance: A Literature Review

2024· review· en· W4401637672 on OpenAlexaff
Sejal Mohapatra

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCircular RNAs in diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircular RNARadioresistancemicroRNATemozolomideGlioblastomaCancer researchRNACompeting endogenous RNABiologyNon-coding RNACancerCisplatinDrug resistanceBioinformaticsLong non-coding RNAGeneCell cultureGeneticsChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Glioblastomas are a high-grade primary brain cancer of astrocytes, a glial cell. The average survival upon diagnosis is 15 months. Researchers have been continuously attempting to develop new drugs and therapies that would exhibit greater efficiency against this cancer. However, tumor resistance is often observed in glioblastomas. Circular RNA is a relatively novel finding of non-coding RNA that is highly stable compared to linear RNA. Recent studies have found a variation in circular RNA expression levels in resistant versus non-resistant cancer cell lines. Thus, researchers have been exploring this endogenous entity to understand the role it may play in chemo- and radioresistant glioblastomas. Methods: A comprehensive look into the most recent findings on this topic was done using Google Scholar and PubMed search engines. Key words used include “circRNA,” “glioblastoma,” and “chemo- and radio-resistance”. This review mainly stems from primary research published between 2017 and 2024. Results: Only a few specific circular RNAs have been found to be implicated in chemoresistance. Research has focused on understanding resistance to temozolomide. However, variation in certain circular RNA expression has also been noted in cisplatin and histone deacytlase inhibitor therapies for glioblastoma treatment. These circular RNAs inhibit the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutics primarily though microRNA sponging. Additionally, similar results were found in radioresistant glioblastoma tumors, whereby specific circular RNAs block apoptosis by altering various protein mechanisms through microRNA sponging and inhibiting translocation. Discussion: Developing methods that inhibit this tumor’s ability to resist otherwise effective therapies may be an ideal method of treatment. Many studies have attempted to modify cellular pathways to facilitate apoptosis of cancer cells. However, due to complex interactions and possible off-target effects, these methods are inefficient. Circular RNAs may serve as improved therapeutic targets due to their tissue specificity and increased stability. Conclusion: The newly identified circular RNAs involved in glioblastoma therapy resistance may be used to increase cancer cell susceptibility to treatments. Knock-out and overexpression analysis indicate these molecules to be sufficient in altering resistance abilities of these cells. Highly specific targeting techniques may therefore be a viable solution for chemo- and radioresistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicCircular RNAs in diseasesFrench-language works237,207