MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401645053 · doi:10.1038/s41398-024-03049-w

Differential neuropsychiatric associations of plasma biomarkers in older adults with major depression and subjective cognitive decline

2024· article· en· W4401645053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yi‐Chia Wei, Yi‐Chia Kung, Chemin Lin, Chun‐Hung Yeh, Pin‐Yuan Chen, Wen‐Yi Huang, Yu‐Chiau Shyu, Ching‐Po Lin, Chih‐Ken Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChang Gung Medical Foundation
KeywordsDepression (economics)Cognitive declineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychiatryCognitionLate life depressionDementiaMedicinePsychologyClinical psychologyGerontologyDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Older adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) or early cognitive decline during the subjective cognitive decline (SCD) stage may exhibit neuropsychiatric symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and subtle cognitive impairment. The clinicopathological features and biological mechanisms of MDD differ from those of SCD among older adults; these conditions thus require different treatment strategies. This study enrolled 82 participants above 50 years old with normal cognitive levels from the communities to examine biomarker-behavior correlations between MDD (n = 23) and SCD (n = 23) relative to a normal control (NC) group (n = 36). Multidomain assessments were performed for all participants, including immunomagnetic reduction tests to detect plasma beta-amyloid (Aβ), total tau (Tau), phosphorylated tau-181 (p-Tau181), neurofilament light chain, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). This study observed that depressive symptoms in MDD were associated with amyloid pathology (plasma Aβ40 vs. HADS-D: R = 0.45, p = 0.031; Aβ42/Aβ40 vs. HADS-D: R = -0.47, p = 0.024), which was not observed in the NC (group difference p < 0.05). Moreover, cognitive decline in MDD was distinguished by a mixed neurodegenerative process involving amyloid (plasma Aβ42 vs. facial memory test: R = 0.48, p = 0.025), tau (Tau/Aβ42 vs. digit symbol substitution test (DSST): R = -0.53, p = 0.01), and astrocytic injury (plasma GFAP vs. Montreal cognitive assessment score: R = -0.44, p = 0.038; plasma GFAP vs. DSST: R = -0.52, p = 0.014), findings that did not apply to the NC (group difference p < 0.05). Moreover, this study revealed different biomarker-behavior correlations between individuals with SCD and the NC. Compared with the NC, cognitive decline in the SCD group might be unrelated to amyloid pathology and instead might be early manifestations of tau pathology. This study underscores the difference in clinicopathological features between MDD and SCD among older adults, which differ from those of the NC. These findings enhance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying MDD and SCD in older individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational PsychiatrySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207