Longitudinal echocardiography in pediatric patients with hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vascular Ehlers-Danlos, Marfan and Loeys-Dietz syndromes have increased risk of aortic dilation and dissection. Previous early studies showed hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) may also have increased risk, with echocardiography screening recommended; subsequent studies have not confirmed the risk or recommended echocardiography. This pediatric-based study assessed aortic dilation prevalence in those with hEDS by serial echocardiographic examinations and assessed family history for aortic dissections. We retrospectively identified individuals with hEDS who had echocardiography studies from the electronic medical records at one pediatric center. Aortic root Z-scores >2.0 were found in 15/225 subjects (average age 12.9 years) on initial echocardiograms, with no Z-score >3.0. Subsequent studies (n = 68) found statistically significant decline in aortic root Z-scores. Repeat echocardiography in those with initial aortic root Z-score >2.0 (n = 10) demonstrated a decline in Z score <2.0 in seven. On final examination, 9/225 (4.0%) had a Z-score >2.0, not statistically different from the general population. No aortic dissection occurred in first- or second-degree relatives. In conclusion, aortic root dilation rate in hEDS is likely not different from the general population. We propose that in the absence of other cardiac findings or suspicion for another disorder, echocardiography is not required in hEDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".