Dragonflies (Odonata) of Kotvice Nature Reserve in the Poodří Protected Landscape Area (Czech Republic)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to summarise the results of dragonfly and damselfly (Odonata) surveys in Kotvice Nature Reserve in the Poodří Protected Landscape Area (Czech Republic).Odonates were studied by sampling adults, larvae, and exuvia in the years 2019 to 2021 at 11 different stations with stagnant waters (e.g.forest and meadow wetlands, meadow pools, wet meadows, oxbow lakes, ponds) and running water (forest stream, Odra river).Altogether, 37 species (30 species in 2019, 31 species in 2020 and 19 species during only one field visit in 2021) were documented in the reserve.Six of them are listed in the Czech redlist -critically endangered species Sympetrum depressiusculum, vulnerable Sympetrum flaveolum, Onychogomphus forcipatus and near threatened Lestes barbarus, Brachytron pratense and Sympetrum meridionale.The occurrence of two species (Coenagrion pulchellum and Somatochlora metallica) in Kotvice Nature Reserve was not confirmed.Currently, a total of 39 species of dragonflies and damselflies are known from Kotvice Nature Reserve. ÚVODSoučasný stav znalostí o výskytu vážek v chráněné krajinné oblasti (CHKO) Poodří je na dobré úrovni.Z území CHKO Poodří byla publikována řada prací, jak s konkrétními daty, tak řada prací zabývajících se faunou vážek CHKO Poodří v obecné rovině (Hanel 1999, Holuša 1999, 2000, Dolný & Mižičová 2011, Klupa & SovíK 2021).První údaje o výskytu vážek z Poodří uvádí TeyrovSKý (1950TeyrovSKý ( , 1951)).Několik druhů z CHKO Poodří ve svých pracích Ac tA M u s e i B e s k i d e n s i s / to M 1 2 / 3 7-6 4 / 2 0 2 2 / i s s n 1 8 0 3 -9 6 0 X
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".