Optimizing co-application of starter ammoniacal-N and K-containing fertilizers for barley in the seed-furrow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is unclear how seed-placed starter ammoniacal-N-and-K fertilizers influence barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seed-crop emergence, and its early establishment, due to salt injury and potential ammonia production and toxicity within the soil profile under different placement rates. Keeping in this view, the study was undertaken to experiment the effects of different fertilizer types, and rates using three different soil types characterized by fine (G1), medium (G2), and coarse (G3) textures when simultaneously placed with barley seed and establish safe-starter fertilizer recommendation models. The fertilizers were applied at varying rates from 0 to 60 kg N ha−1 and 0 to 74 kg K ha−1 alongside barley seeding. Maximum predicted safe starter ammoniacal-N-fertilizer rates were as follows: urea = 15, 35 and 26 kg N ha−1 is safe for G1, G2 and G3 soils, respectively. DAP (Diammonium phosphate), 52 kg N ha−1 is safe for fine textures whilst 12 and 37 kg N ha−1 for medium and coarse textures. MAP (Monoammonium phosphate) is safely placed at 55, 11 and ≥60 kg N ha−1 for G1 – G3 soils. For MOP (Muriate of Potash) and SOP (Sulfate of Potash), 67 and ≥74 kg K ha−1 were ideal for improved barley emergence across all the soil types. Visual appearances including delayed seed emergence, leaf chlorosis, and stubby coleoptiles were observed at varying seed-placed N and K rates. Intricate relationships among various emergence parameters, root architecture, aboveground and root biomass, chlorophyll content, all showing significant interrelationships. Data indicate that cubic model could be used for predicting seed-safe rates for multiple fertilizer types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".