Perceived Styles of Parents on Alexithymia: The Mediating Role of Emotional Schemas in Married People with Migraine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the perceived styles of parents on alexithymia with the mediating role of emotional schemas in married people with migraine. In terms of practical purpose, the current research is a descriptive-correlation with structural equations. The statistical population includes all married men and women in Tehran who referred for migraine treatment to hospitals in 2022, the number of whom is 440. Therefore, with the help of Cochran's formula, 208 people were selected and the questionnaire was distributed among them in a convenient and simple random method. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to determine the validity of the questionnaire using the method of content validity and reliability of the questionnaire. Finally, the coefficients showed that the data collection tool has high reliability. In order to check the validity of the questionnaire, confirmatory factor analysis and in order to check the research hypotheses from structural equation modeling, the structural equation modeling (SEM) method was used with the help of SmartPLS 3 software. Conclusion: In the end, all research hypotheses have been confirmed and suggestions and solutions have been presented to improve the physical and mental states of families and the perceived styles of parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".