Two-dimensional ion chromatography tandem-mass spectrometric (2D-IC-MS/MS) method for the analysis of phosphorus compounds in soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Development of 2D-IC-MS/MS method for the analysis of phosphorus compounds in soil. • Chromatographic separation of phosphorus compounds achieved. • Interferences from insource fragmentation, isobars, and isotopologues eliminated. • Challenges associated with misannotation of phosphorus compounds addressed. • Speciation of phosphorus compounds in soil samples achieved. Investigations into soil organic phosphorus (P o ) dynamics are instrumental in understanding the transformations and processes responsible for ecosystem productivity. However, quantitative analysis of P o in a soil environment is extremely challenging due to low target analyte concentrations and matrix interferences with chromatography and analysis. Consequently, a two-dimensional ion chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (2D-IC-MS/MS) method was developed to estimate soil P o concentrations. The first dimension diverted early eluting anions to waste while preconcentrating P compounds in a trap column, followed by chromatographic separation and detection in the second dimension. Detection was done using a mass spectrometer, and quantification was performed using the multiple reaction monitoring scan (MRM) method. The linear range of the studied P compounds, mostly nucleotides, was 0.05 – 50 ng/mL. Most P compounds were detected and quantified in calcareous subsoil samples in the concentration ranges 0.70 – 51.78 ng/g. The developed method achieved chromatographic separation that allowed unambiguous identification of isobars/isomers and isotopologues contributing to interferences in MS detection. However, improvements to the extraction method and post-clean-up procedures are required due to the complexity of soil extract composition, extreme matrix effect and/or loss of analyte during preconcentration. The method is ideal for simultaneously analyzing P compounds from environmental samples to elucidate key components of the soil P dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".