Authors' Reply: Proton Pump Inhibitors May Cause a Decline in eGFR by Inhibiting Organic Cation Transporter 2–Dependent Creatinine Secretion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We thank Pabla and Sparreboom for their insightful comments1 highlighting the possibility that the excess eGFR decline seen with pantoprazole in our post hoc analysis2 of the COMPASS trial could be due to reduced creatinine secretion rather than causing kidney injury. The evidence that proton pump inhibitors inhibit organic cation transporter 2 comes primarily from in silico and in vitro experiments,3,4 and its existence/magnitude of the effect is uncertain in humans. Additional analyses of the COMPASS trial suggest that the effect of pantoprazole compared with placebo on rate of eGFR change was attenuated in patients who discontinued treatment before eGFR reassessment (−0.04 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, 95% confidence interval, −0.26 to 0.17) compared with those who remained on treatment (−0.60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, 95% confidence interval, −0.85 to −0.34). We reported the mean effect across subgroups given the high risk of presenting biased treatment effects based on postrandomization subgroups,5 but this disparity could support a reversible effect of pantoprazole on eGFR, possibly due to inhibition of creatinine secretion. However, this finding could also be explained by lower total drug exposure, thereby suggesting a dose-response or threshold exposure effect (i.e., those who stopped treatment early avoided measurable pantoprazole-induced kidney injury because they had less drug exposure). These possibilities could be further explored in future proton pump inhibitor studies by serial measurements of kidney function beginning early after starting treatment to understand potential acute effects and continuing until after study drug discontinuation to understand reversibility of effects. In addition, the use of analytes that are less affected by organic cation transporter 2 inhibition, such as cystatin C, may be beneficial. The potential adverse effect of proton pump inhibitors on renal function remains relevant, particularly for those at higher risk for progressive kidney disease and/or who have weak indications for chronic proton pump inhibitor use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.062 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.031 | 0.035 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".