Proteome profiling reveals opportunities to investigate biomarkers of oxidative stress and immune responses in blubber biopsies from free-ranging baleen whales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Over 25% of cetacean species worldwide are listed as critically endangered, endangered or vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Objective and widely applicable tools to assess cetacean health are therefore vital for population monitoring and to inform conservation initiatives. Novel blubber biomarkers of physiological state are examples of such tools that could be used to assess overall health. Proteins extracted from blubber likely originate from both the circulation and various cell types within the tissue itself, and their expression is responsive to signals originating from other organs and the nervous system. Blubber proteins can therefore capture information on physiological stressors experienced by individuals at the time of sampling. For the first time, we assess the feasibility of applying shotgun proteomics to blubber biopsy samples collected from free-ranging baleen whales. Samples were collected from minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) (n = 10) in the Gulf of St Lawrence, Canada. Total protein was extracted using a RIPA cell lysis and extraction buffer-based protocol. Extracted proteins were separated and identified using nanoflow Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization in tandem with Mass Spectrometry. We mapped proteins to known biological pathways and determined whether they were significantly enriched based on the proteome profile. A pathway enrichment map was created to visualize overlap in tissue-level biological processes. Amongst the most significantly enriched biological pathways were those involved in immune system function: inflammatory responses, leukocyte-mediated immunity and the humoral immune response. Pathways associated with responses to oxidative stress were also enriched. Using a suite of such protein biomarkers has the potential to better assess the overall health and physiological state of live individuals through remote biopsy sampling. This information is vital for population health assessments to predict population trajectories, and ultimately guide and monitor conservation priorities and initiatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".