CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: THE GULF-CARDIOGENIC SHOCK REGISTRY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Background: There is a paucity of data regarding acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in the Gulf region. This study addressed this knowledge gap by examining patients experiencing AMI-CS in the Gulf region and analyzing hospital and short-term follow-up mortality. Methods: The Gulf-Cardiogenic Shock registry included 1,513 patients with AMI-CS diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2022. Results: The incidence of AMI-CS was 4.1% (1,513/37,379). The median age was 60 years. The most common presentation was ST-elevation MI (73.83%). In-hospital mortality was 45.5%. Majority of patients were in SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock classification) stage D and E (68.94%). Factors associated with hospital mortality were previous coronary artery bypass graft (odds ratio [OR]: 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.321-4.693), cerebrovascular accident (OR: 1.621; 95% CI: 1.032-2.547), chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.572; 95% CI: 1.158-2.136), non-ST-elevation MI (OR: 1.744; 95% CI: 1.058-2.873), cardiac arrest (OR: 5.702; 95% CI: 3.640-8.933), SCAI stage D and E (OR: 19.146; 95% CI: 9.902-37.017), prolonged QRS (OR: 10.012; 95% CI: 1.006-1.019), right ventricular dysfunction (OR: 1.679; 95% CI: 1.267-2.226), and ventricular septal rupture (OR: 6.008; 95% CI: 2.256-15.998). Forty percent had invasive hemodynamic monitoring, 90.02% underwent revascularization, and 45.80% received mechanical circulatory support (41.31% had intra-aortic balloon pump and 14.21% had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/Impella devices). Survival at 12 months was 51.49% (95% CI: 46.44%-56.29%). Conclusions: The study highlighted the significant burden of AMI-CS in this region, with high in-hospital mortality. The study identified several key risk factors associated with increased hospital mortality. Despite the utilization of invasive hemodynamic monitoring, revascularization, and mechanical circulatory support in a substantial proportion of patients, the 12-month survival rate remained relatively low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".