MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401701377 · doi:10.1128/jvi.00535-24

A spike-based mRNA vaccine that induces durable and broad protection against porcine deltacoronavirus in piglets

2024· article· en· W4401701377 on OpenAlexaff
Jizong Li, Li Xiao, Zhuoqi Chen, Liyuan Fan, Wei Wang, Rongli Guo, Zhaoming He, Hongpeng Hu, Jianhao Jiang, Lixiang Zhao, Tianyi Zhong, Baochao Fan, Xing Zhu, Bin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyImmune systemVirologyMessenger RNACoronavirusAntibodyImmunizationVaccinationImmunologyDNA vaccinationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)GeneMedicineDiseaseGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are important pathogens for humans and other vertebrates, causing severe respiratory and intestinal infections that have become a threat to public health because of the potential for interspecies transmission between animals and humans. Therefore, the development of safe, effective vaccines remains a top priority for the control of CoV infection. The unique immunological characteristics of vaccines featuring messenger RNA (mRNA) present an advantageous tool for coronavirus vaccine development. Here, we designed two lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated mRNA (mRNA-LNP) vaccines: one encoding full-length spike (S) protein and the other encoding the spike ectodomain (Se) from porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV). Fourteen days after primary immunization, both mRNA vaccines induced high levels of immunoglobulin G and neutralizing antibodies in mice, with the S vaccine showing better performance than the Se vaccine. Passive immune protection of the S mRNA vaccine in suckling piglets was confirmed by the induction of robust PDCoV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. The S mRNA vaccine also showed better protective effects than the inactivated vaccine. Our results suggest that the novel PDCoV-S mRNA-LNP vaccine may have the potential to combat PDCoV infection. IMPORTANCE: As an emerging porcine enteropathogenic coronavirus, porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) has the potential for cross-species transmission, attracting extensive attention. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are a promising option for combating emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases, as evidenced by the demonstrated efficacy of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Here, we first demonstrated that PDCoV-S mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines could induce potent humoral and cellular immune responses in mice. An evaluation of passive immune protection of S mRNA vaccines in suckling piglets confirmed that the protective effect of mRNA vaccine was better than that of inactivated vaccine. This study suggests that the PDCoV-S mRNA-LNP vaccine may serve as a potential and novel vaccine candidate for combating PDCoV infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207