MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401715122 · doi:10.1128/jvi.00128-24

CGRP inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection of bronchial epithelial cells, and its pulmonary levels correlate with viral clearance in critical COVID-19 patients

2024· article· en· W4401715122 on OpenAlexaff
Caio César Barbosa Bomfim, Hugo Génin, Andréa Cottoignies-Callamarte, Sarah Gallois‐Montbrun, Émilie Murigneux, Anette Sams, Arielle R. Rosenberg, Sandrine Belouzard, Jean Dubuisson, Olivier Kosminder, Frédéric Pène, Benjamin Terrier, Morgane Bomsel, Yonatan Ganor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleSidaction
KeywordsBiologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Virology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakViral sheddingBetacoronavirusPandemicImmunologyCoronavirusVirusPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upon infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) present with life-threatening respiratory distress, pulmonary damage, and cytokine storm. One unexplored component in COVID-19 is the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which is highly abundant in the airways and could converge in multiple aspects of COVID-19-related pulmonary pathophysiology. Whether CGRP affects SARS-CoV-2 infection directly remains elusive. We show that in critical COVID-19 patients, CGRP is increased in both plasma and lungs. Importantly, CGRP pulmonary levels are elevated in early SARS-CoV-2-positive patients and restored to baseline upon subsequent viral clearance in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. We further show that CGRP and its stable analog SAX directly inhibit infection of bronchial Calu-3 epithelial cells with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Alpha variants in a dose-dependent manner. Both pre- and post-infection treatments with CGRP and/or SAX are enough to block SARS-CoV-2 productive infection of Calu-3 cells. CGRP-mediated inhibition occurs via activation of the CGRP receptor and involves down-regulation of both SARS-CoV-2 entry receptors at the surface of Calu-3 cells. Together, we propose that increased pulmonary CGRP mediates beneficial viral clearance in critical COVID-19 patients by directly inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 propagation. Hence, CGRP-based interventions could be harnessed for management of COVID-19.IMPORTANCEThe neuropeptide CGRP is highly abundant in the airways. Due to its immunomodulatory, vasodilatory, and anti-viral functions, CGRP could affect multiple aspects of COVID-19-related pulmonary pathophysiology. Yet, the interplay between CGRP and SARS-CoV-2 during COVID-19 remains elusive. Herein, we show that pulmonary levels of CGRP are increased in critical COVID-19 patients, at an early stage of their disease when patients are SARS-CoV-2-positive. Upon subsequent viral clearance, CGRP levels are restored to baseline in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. We further show that pre- and post-infection treatments with CGRP directly inhibit infection of Calu-3 bronchial epithelial cells with SARS -CoV-2, via activation of the CGRP receptor leading to decreased expression of both SARS-CoV-2 entry receptors. Together, we propose that increased pulmonary CGRP is beneficial in COVID-19, as CGRP-mediated inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection could contribute to viral clearance in critical COVID-19 patients. Accordingly, CGRP-based formulations could be useful for COVID-19 management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207